Plus ça change. After Euro 2016, England continue with the bang average

4 Sep

Slovakia 0 England 1. Three points. And a win. On paper that’s all that Big ‘Sam’ Allardyce could have asked for on his opening game in charge. Yet having stated up front that he’d have been happy with a draw, he was that close to achieving his stated low key level of start to his time in charge of the national team. That may work at Sunderland or West Ham but for England, after their woeful Euro 2016 (and let’s not pretend it was anything but) this was just more of the same.

England won. That’s an indisputable fact . And so often I’ve bigged up the fact that goals are the only thing that count at full time. Yet at a time when the impossibility of qualification failure makes results largely irrelevant, performance is as key as result. And this was nothing but anti-climax.

0-0, 1-0. Forget the scoreline. A draw or a win away to England’s ‘closest rivals’ makes no difference. Failure to qualify from a group including Malta, Lithuania and Scotland is simply unfeasible. That’s not arrogance; that’s fact. Yet that game was, to quote one sofa based observer,  ‘bang average’.

At a time when the best sort of kick back from the Euros was needed, England did everything possible to continue with the uninspirational. Non-chance followed non-chance. Even when Martin Skrtel was eventually (arguably, he should have gone earlier) dismissed, England still flattered to deceive.

It was like watching the cast of American Pie v the cast of Porkys in a race to lose their viginity. There was a lot of bluster, a lot of fighting talk, a lot of huff and puff yet no thrust, no penetration and no scoring. In the end, it was a last gasp stab through the legs as Slovakia’s keeper let Adam Lallana’s poke claim his first England goal. At the 27th attempt .

Instead, after the horror of the summer and Euro 2016 nothing has changed – Glen Hoddle was still there talking bollocks; England were still doing their best to make the mediocre look like world beaters.

Any positives?  Either my TV was broken or ‘that band’ weren’t present. Regardless, that was the only win for those of us watching at home.

We’re two years away from knowing how well England may perform at the World Cup finals. We’re two years away from knowing which of Sunday’s starting XI will even kick off   England’s attempt to lift the trophy.

But, for now, we know one thing.

Huge improvement is needed.

American-Pie-Gallery-1

Nick Bruzon 

 

 

 

Advertisements

7 Responses to “Plus ça change. After Euro 2016, England continue with the bang average”

  1. Mark Herzog September 4, 2016 at 7:28 pm #

    Well, if we can’t be good, (we weren’t), then be lucky.

    Ps
    Did anyone notice that West Ham have a new ground?

    • nickbruzon September 4, 2016 at 7:34 pm #

      No? Seriously? Surely somebody would have mentioned that!

  2. Richard September 4, 2016 at 7:46 pm #

    Who would you have as captain. It should be someone really good…and there is our first problem!

  3. Rob September 4, 2016 at 8:28 pm #

    Nick, I wouldn’t even bother wasting your time writing about England at the moment. They don’t really deserve the time or effort . I don’t quite understand how we fail to break down sides; no creativity or skill to beat a man, no mental strength and no organisation. The latter two I expect big Sam to sort out given time, but it speaks volumes about the state of English football when we have to appoint someone who likes physical teams, hard to break down and direct…but pretty limited when it comes to guile and creativity. The FA need to sort things our, give our younger players a chance to flourish…but all they care about is Money. What’s the point in having the greatest league in the world when most of the players aren’t from England and the international team are so poor?

  4. aussiebee September 4, 2016 at 10:43 pm #

    It did tell us one thing, that’s what happened to the Griffin Park pitch we dug up and got rid of at the start of last season. It was relocated to Slovakia.

  5. Brentfordbear September 5, 2016 at 11:53 am #

    The unfeasible is very feasible. And your inability to see that speaks volumes. England have no divine right to top the group.

    • nickbruzon September 5, 2016 at 4:20 pm #

      I’d agree that England have no divine right although I didn’t actually say they would top the group. Just that they would qualify. Which I still believe, despite how poor they were. That such abject averageness can be rewarded probably says as much about qualification protocol for the expanded Euros/Wold Cup as anything else

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: